Thomas is a gang researcher from Los Angeles, and has had the “Los Angeles Gangs” blog since November 2008. There are not many posts on this blog, but in November 2008 he discussed topics such as: gang-free schools and communities program, the G.R.E.A.T program, adolescent homicides in Los Angeles, gang prevention strategies, and the United States most dangerous gang, MS 13. His first and last post of June 2009 was about police and gangs. I focused on Thomas’ “Gang-Free Schools - Is it Possible?” and “Police and Gangs” posts.
The first post, “Gang-Free Schools - Is it Possible?,” explains the Gang-Free Schools and Communities Program that was launched in 2000 to address/reduce youth gang crime in schools and communities throughout the nation. This post is very academic because Thomas writes professionally, similar to an essay. It has a structure that introduces the topic, then explains phase 1 and 2 of the program. Since he does not use any slang or vocabulary his voice is strictly professional, and does not take a side on the program. He is simply informing his reader on what the program is. His sentence structure is descriptive and follows proper punctuation. At the end of the post, he adds, “I would like to get your thoughts on this program and whether or not you think it works, and if so, why or why not. It would be very interesting to see what suggestions we may be able to come up with.” This shows his interest in the topic and others opinions on the program he discussed.
The second post, “Police and Gangs,” begins with a disturbing video of a gang member being chased by police, and then kicked in the head when lying on the floor to be handcuffed. Immediately after the video, Thomas writes, “This video speaks for itself… (or does it it?).” This is establishes his voice as having a conversation with his audience. He states how he feels about the video by saying it’s self-explanatory, and then poses a question that makes the reader think why the content in the video is either right, wrong or both. In this post, Thomas makes it clear that tension will always persist between gang members and police officers. Although he states that gang intervention is a great idea in theory and has worked for some cities, it doesn’t mean it will work for every gang member. He supports his argument by adding many examples of how this has been the case in some situations. Thomas seems to be leaning towards the side of police officers. He states, “To be totally honest with you, some Police are just human. In my personal opinion some are good, some are stubborn, and some are just flat out interesting (aka too dumb to be on the job). Bad decisions are made by all, but when you are a Police Officer, the actions of one can adversely affect us all.”This statement captures his voice because he expresses his honest feelings towards police. He agrees that everyone makes bad decisions, but police officer’s actions are especially looked at because they are the authority. Overall, in this post, Thomas steers away from using proper punctuation, and some of his sentences are shorter than others, which adds to the way he portrays his voice. At the end of the post, he adds, “Please leave your comments below.” This shows that he is open to new ideas by encouraging his readers to comment on this post.